Compositionality Josh Dever
نویسنده
چکیده
ing from the terminological details of mediaeval semantics, Lambert’s rule requires that denotational terms in a present-tensed sentence denote the current satisfiers of their associated descriptive conditions, rather than past or future (or merely possible) such satisfiers. Later rules of the Summa Lamberti require denotational terms in pasttensed sentences to denote the past satisfiers of their associated descriptive conditions, 3That is, problems for giving a compositional semantics for a particular language (in this case, English). I will use the phrase ‘problems for compositionality’ in this way throughout.
منابع مشابه
Supervaluations Debugged
We must begin by stating an erroneous view. Modality may be supposed to affect the assertion in its formal character, and without regard to that which is asserted. We may take for instance a content S – P, not yet asserted, and may claim for modality the power of affirming this content S – P, unaltered and unqualified, in several ways. S – P, it is supposed, may be asserted, for instance, eithe...
متن کاملLiving the Life Aquatic Does Presupposition Accommodation Mandate Dynamic Semantics?
What should a semantic theory for a language tell us? A traditional answer goes back at least to Frege and Russell: • The Static Conception of Semantics (Preliminary Version): A semantic theory should assign a proposition, conceived of as some carrier of meaning that can play the role of truth condition determination, to each (or at least each declarative) sentence. A competing answer has emerg...
متن کاملUsing Variables Within the Expectation Formula
This paper introduces two constraints on the use of variables inside the expectation formula. The constraints are, roughly, (1) that the variable takes the same conditional expectation in each event in the partition and (2) that the total expected value be a linear function of the variable for each event in the partition. We argue that the reasoning in one version of the “two envelope paradox” ...
متن کاملSlingshots and Boomerangs
A “slingshot” proof suggested by Kurt Gödel (1944) has been recast by Stephen Neale (1995) as a deductive argument showing that no non-truthfunctional sentence connective can permit the combined use, within its scope, of two truth-functionally valid inference principles involving definite descriptions. According to Neale, this result provides indirect support for Russell’s Theory of Description...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003